Research & Presentations

Publications

Peer-Reviewed Publications:


Working Papers: 

Abstract: Women have outpaced men both at the ballot box and in educational attainment in recent decades in the United States. Since education is closely tied to political participation, we consider these two trends in tandem and assess how much of the gender gap in voting  is attributable to educational differences, differential returns to education, or other, non-education related elements. Using comprehensive educational data from Massachusetts students matched with voter records, we estimate a Blinder-Oaxaca-Kitagawa decomposition to understand how educational attainment and other educational experiences contribute to gender voting differentials. In our sample, women outvote men by 4.4 percentage points in the first possible presidential election that young people can vote in after allowing time to complete college. We find that roughly 60 percent of this gap in voting is due to differences in educational attainment by gender, with only some of the remaining portion of variation explained by either gendered differences in educational experiences or gendered returns to these educational characteristics. These results broadly suggest that the gender gap in voting can largely be explained by a rise in women's education and that if men reached the educational levels of women, we would expect higher voting rates for men.


Abstract: The multitude of state election laws enacted in recent years implies a widespread acknowledgement that the "direct costs" of voting matter. Recent studies have affirmed that the costs of voting, such as those imposed by changes in election laws requiring voter identification, can reduce turnout particularly among certain groups. Other work has demonstrated laws that reduce the costs of voting do not always increase turnout. Amidst these conflicting findings, I argue that the impact of changes in the cost of voting are best understood in aggregate, as the process of voting in each state is governed by a web of overlapping laws and requirements. I further argue that increases to the direct costs of voting disproportionately impact areas with less-educated populations. Using two-way fixed effects models for county-level voter turnout in the six presidential elections between 2000 and 2020, I estimate that a standard deviation increase in the aggregate "costs of voting" decrease turnout in U.S. counties by 1.1 percentage points. Additional estimates show that the impacts are concentrated among counties with the lowest education levels---a one standard deviation increase in the cost of voting only decreases turnout by 0.86 percentage points in highly-educated counties of each state. Echoing work that shows such administrative burdens disproportionately affect less educated individuals, these findings offer suggestive evidence that increases in the costs of voting push less educated individuals out of the electorate. 



Conference Presentations & Invited Talks


Other Publications (Not Peer Reviewed)

Media Mentions & Engagement